Get our daily Newsletter

 
 
 

* The Tueni legacy

Are the freedoms and ideals Gebran gave his life for in jeopardy?

nowlebanon.com, Lebanon, December 12, 2007

By Zahra Hankir

Two years after his tragic assassination, editor and publisher of An-Nahar and Member of Parliament Gebran Tueni is still remembered as one of Lebanon’s most vociferous promoters of freedom of speech. His legacy – both journalistic and political – is firmly tied to the leading role he played in the 2005 Cedar Revolution.

As founder of Nahar ash-Shabab, An-Nahar’s weekly supplement on youth issues, Tueni believed in the potential for younger generations to bring about change. The idea for a "shadow government," composed of youth leaders from universities across the country, was inspired by Tueni and became a reality after his passing.

An-Nahar journalist Mohammad Salam told NOW Lebanon that the memory of Tueni brings to mind the struggle for "freedom, in the context of the press." Indeed, Tueni’s most famous utterance was, "The difference between darkness and light is a word." That phrase, adopted by An-Nahar as its slogan, embodies the very cause that Tueni died for: speaking out, no matter what the cost.

Remembering Gebran

On Sunday, December 10, 2007, the World Association of Newspapers (WAN) and An-Nahar held the second annual Gebran Tueni Award ceremony. The event commemorated Tueni and awarded Michel Hajji Georgiou, political editor at Lebanese daily L’Orient-Le Jour, for his efforts and contributions to press freedom.

Nayla Tueni, Gebran’s daughter and the deputy-general manager of An-Nahar, spoke fervently at the event, challenging the Lebanese to take responsibility for ensuring that her father’s legacy and spirit remain alive.

In an exclusive interview with NOW Lebanon, Nayla Tueni elaborated on these concerns. "Is it reasonable that we have a presidential vacuum in Lebanon?" she demanded. "Is it reasonable that we amend our constitution, after everything we and our martyrs paid for? The politicians didn’t fulfill the responsibility they had toward their martyrs. This is why [Gebran’s] legacy is threatened."

Many today are questioning whether the sacrifices made by Gebran Tueni and others over the past three years have been properly honored by Lebanon and, in particular, its political class. Nonetheless, Nayla Tueni explained that it is her fellow youth, and their devotion to Lebanon and its martyrs, who reassure her that her father’s legacy will never be lost: "They’re the ones who will take the cause, rise and go on."

Through Nahar ash-Shabab, launched in the early nineties by Tueni, Lebanese youth were given an opportunity to publicly express their political and social opinions. According to Melkar al-Khoury, managing assistant director of the Foundation for Human and Humanitarian Rights, "by giving this platform to the youth, Gebran was someone who went beyond political parties and beyond indoctrination."

How free is free?

According to a report by Paris-based international NGO Reporters sans frontières (RSF), Lebanon ranks 107 among 168 nations surveyed worldwide in terms of freedom of the press. In 2005, the country plummeted 21 positions, from 87 to 108. The assassinations of both Tueni and Dr. Samir Kassir, a prominent academic and fellow An-Nahar journalist, are some of the most overt indications of why the ranking fell. May Chidiac, a leading television journalist, was also targeted shortly before Gebran in 2005, but miraculously survived the attack. All three have been known for their outspoken anti-Syrian positions.

The factors used by RSF to measure freedom of press include "every kind of violation directly affecting journalists (such as murders, imprisonment, physical attacks and threats) and news media (censorship, confiscation of issues, searches and harassment)." In addition, it also monitors the "degree of impunity enjoyed by those responsible for these press freedom violations." This factor is particularly relevant to the case of Lebanon, given that those responsible for the deaths of both Tueni and Kassir, and indeed many journalists before them, have yet to be brought to justice.

Nonetheless, press freedom in Lebanon remains much more robust than elsewhere in the region, where media is often monopolized by the state and journalists suffer under judicial systems which directly or indirectly limit their self-expression. But Salam stressed the importance of keeping in mind that Lebanon has "paid dearly for this margin of freedom, irrespective of how wide or narrow it is now."

Salam contends that the "ghost of killings" hang over journalists’ heads, and that "this is serious and dangerous because it has led journalists to a sort of auto-censorship," noting that though they may be outspoken, most journalists still exercise caution when covering certain topics.

Toward a freer press?

Several organizations in Lebanon, including the Samir Kassir Foundation, monitor the freedom of the press in Lebanon. One such NGO is the Foundation for Human and Humanitarian Rights, an advocacy group that issues annual reports on the status of human rights in Lebanon, including that of the Lebanese press.

According to Khoury, a line can be drawn at the Syrian withdrawal of 2005. "Before that, the pressure was mainly from the intelligence services, whether Syrian or Lebanese," said Khoury, pointing out that many journalists received threats or – like Selim al-Louze and Kamel Mroue – were even killed.

Since the Syrian withdrawal, Khoury said, self-censorship has emerged as a significant phenomenon: "Even if some taboos have been broken, [such as] talking about Syrian activity in Lebanon, journalists tend to have their own censorship vis-à-vis the direction of the media they’re working for or the political factions they don’t agree with."

For example, during last summer’s July War, Michel Eddé, chairman of L’Orient-Le Jour, received phone calls accusing the winner of this year’s Gebran Tueni Award, Georgiou, of being a Zionist agent because "he wasn’t going along with the general trend of resistance media."

Likewise, some taboos still persist within Lebanon. Many Lebanese journalists, for example, are very cautious when writing about Hezbollah and other controversial sectarian and social issues – some of which are simply dodged altogether. Khoury gave as an example, the invisible line that was erected under the presidency of Emile Lahoud, which even caricaturists did not cross. In mid-2006, masses of Hezbollah supporters rioted in the streets in protest after LBC aired a segment portraying Hassan Nasrallah on its sketch comedy program, Basmat Watan, demonstrating that even if the media is brave enough to cross these invisible lines, very real consequences can emerge on the ground.

Press freedom is obstructed in a different sense by the political affiliations and leanings of individual journalists and, in particular, the organizations they work for. According to Khoury, "Some newspapers indirectly launch racist statements vis-à-vis Syrian workers, or Palestinians, or even Iraqi refugees." Khoury said that the concept of freedom of expression is "not very clear in the heads of journalists and the owners of the media, [who directly or indirectly] impose their own doctrines and religious and political agendas… Every media group has its political calculus."

Preserving Gebran’s legacy

Two years after his death, Tueni is sorely missed by An-Nahar and, indeed, by Lebanon as a whole. It is his outspoken voice, Nayla Tueni told NOW Lebanon – more important than ever in today’s context – that is missed the most.

So long as journalists remain constrained in any way – whether by intimidation or even by the political biases of their organizations – the voice and spirit of Tueni must serve as a reminder of what the press in Lebanon should be: a forum for expression, free from political and sectarian constraints and, most of all, free from fear.

For Salam, despite setbacks, Tueni’s legacy can never be truly lost: "If it’s going to be lost, it means that we are giving it away. And I don’t think that any of us are prepared to give it away."

Ideals, after all, cannot be killed – as long as voices still exist to promote them.

top

 

 

 

 

 

 

Best View

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© The Levant Institute

Tel: +44 (0) 20 8817 1087 Fax: +44 (0) 20 870 916 1853

The Levant Institute online: http://www.thelevantinstitute.org

Eamil: info@thelevantinstitute.org

 

Levant News online: http://www.thisissyria.net

Email: levantnews@thisissyria.net

 

The Levant Institue Bares no responsibility for contents not clearly marked as its work.

Comments published on this site do not necessarily represent those of The Levant Institute not Levant News.

.